Wednesday, February 10, 2016
10 Years of Muriel Memories: 2007-2008
So we’d finished up our first year of the Muriels, and by all accounts it was a success. So maybe this little brainchild had some legs. Now it was time to think long-term – how to make the Muriels last? Naturally, the first step was to expand out voting body. As happens every year, there was some attrition, which seems particularly inevitable since we were an unknown quantity that inaugural year and some people got on board to discover it wasn’t for them. Nonetheless, Steve and I started seeking out some more viable candidates. It helped that, earlier in ’07, I took a writing gig with the sadly now defunct Screengrab, and I took the opportunity to enlist a few of my fellow Screengrabbers. Beyond that, we began branching out into the blogosphere and rolling the dice on some talented writers who hadn’t been in our sights previously. One of these new voters, Hedwig van Driel, allowed us to make inroads into Europe. For years I referred to her as our first non-American voter, which as it turns out was inaccurate – first-year voter Matt Riviera was a French expatriate living and working in Australia.
Now that we grew the voting base, I decided it was time to make ourselves a little spiffier and more presentable for the small but devoted cabal of Muriel-watchers. I contacted our multi-talented voter Martin McClellan to design a banner for the Muriels web site, one which still adorns our homepage today. But not all snazzy graphics were commissioned by me. Shortly after we invited him to be a voter, Craig Kennedy took it upon himself to put his Photoshop skills to good use by spoofing existing one-sheets in order to pay witty tribute to Muriel (I’ve posted my favorite above).
We also received some welcome attention from media both old and new. Steve and I both made our first (and thusfar only) trip to Toronto for the festival, where we met a number of other super-cool critics and bloggers. One of them, the inimitable Victor J. Morton, enfolded us into his circle of movie nerds, and later on during the awards he featured a section of the aforementioned Ms. Van Driel’s piece on Cate Blanchett in I’m Not There in his regular "Culture Briefs" column in The Washington Times. We certainly didn’t expect that, nor did we expect a post from Jim Emerson, who at the time was serving as webmaster of Roger Ebert’s site. I hadn’t received any warning that this might happen- one day, I simply decided to read Roger’s latest reviews, only to see Muriel staring back at me from the home page. Best. Surprise. Ever. We returned the favor to Jim by inviting him to join our ranks the follow year.
As for the awards themselves, it quickly became apparent that expanding the voting body was well worth the effort, since by featuring a more broad-minded group of cinema lovers we became more idiosyncratic in our tastes (not to mention our awards presentations – let’s not forget Jenny Sekwa’s tribute to Javier Bardem set to “Strangers in the Night”). Nowhere was this more apparent than in our awarding of the Best Lead Performance – Female not to an Oscar favorite as we had the year before (sorry, Helen Mirren) but to Dutch actress Carice van Houten for her breakout role in Paul Verhoeven’s post-WWII saga BLACK BOOK.
It was also our awarding of van Houten’s performance that led to our first bit of controversy and outcry, not so much for the performance itself as for a fairly racy photo I posted on my blog in conjunction with the award announcement. A number of people who were following the awards accused me of using a provocative image to drum up attention for the Muriels. In addition, they felt that by focusing on Ms. van Houten’s (obvious) sex appeal, we diminished the skill of the performance as a whole by portraying the film as gussied-up exploitation. Of course, this was never my intent – I was mostly trying to post an image from the movie that I hadn’t seen hundreds of times already – and besides, if you know Verhoeven’s work , you’ll recognize that there’s always more than a whiff of exploitation to pretty much everything he does. Nonetheless, I ended up replacing the image with something less polarizing in order to smooth things over. Sure, it could be seen as lily-livered on my part, but the Muriels weren’t just my creation anymore, and I wanted to make sure they weren’t derailed by something as relatively insignificant as a photograph.
Finally, holy crap 2007 was a great year for movies. No Country For Old Men was a great Best Picture winner for us, but I actually prefer our #2 and #3 finishers, There Will Be Blood and Zodiac. Oh, and when Ben Affleck’s Argo won back at the Oscars in 2012, I made sure to point out to anyone who would listen that the Muriels anticipated his emergence as a filmmaker of note five years previously.
Coming tomorrow: Muriel discovers social media, leading to massive growth of our voting body, as well as our first dark horse Best Film winner.
Tuesday, February 9, 2016
10 Years of Muriels Memories – 2006-2007
Note: I’ll be posting my memories of the Muriel Awards every day leading up to this year’s Muriels unveiling. I’ve labeled each post based on both the year of the films being awarded and the year in which the awards were actually presented. In this case, the awards were for 2006 films but were presented in 2007.
A lot of you have probably heard about how Steve Carlson and I hatched the idea for the Muriels back in December 2006 while we were watching Out 1 at the Museum of the Moving Image. It really was that simple – one of us turned to the other (during an intermission, naturally) and said something like, “hey, wouldn’t it be cool to start up a movie poll for us and some of our friends?” Once we agreed that it would, in fact, be cool, we went about sketching out how we wanted to make it happen. I came up with some rules and voting categories, he rounded up most of the voters with the exception of a few personal friends I brought to the party, and we kind of rushed a ballot out to the voters we’d enlisted by the end of the year.
One thing we didn’t have yet was a name. When I first sent out the ballots, I actually included a space in which the voters might suggest a name under which we could operate – after all, an (INSERT NAME HERE) Movie Award just wouldn’t have much mystique, y’know? However, when the ballots started coming in, there were no suggestions that really sounded right. I somewhat hastily began brainstorming for something that if nothing else might serve as a temporary name until the right name came along, and I settled on the name of my guinea pig, Muriel. I ran this by the other voters and was surprised by how positive the reaction was, so it stuck.
Once the ballot deadline arrived that first year, I started tabulating the ballots from our 13 voters, which seems like nothing now but felt pretty daunting at the time. After I tallied all the votes, it turned out that we had a tie for Best Film – specificially, Children of Men and United 93. I was a little uneasy about kicking off the first year by announcing a tie for our top award, so I ended up sending out an e-mail to the voters asking them all to choose one or the other, and the one with more votes would be our winner for the year. However, as the runoff votes started to roll in, I received a mail from someone else asking whether I’d received his ballot. I hadn’t, and asked him to re-send it, and when I received it and added in his votes, his #1 placement of The Departed in the Best Film category caused it to overtake both the previous “winners” and claim the award for itself.
I appreciate everyone who has ever participated in the Muriels, but I have a special place in my heart for those people who’ve been with the group ever since the beginning. To commemorate our tenth year, I wanted to try to involve as many original voters as I could in one way or another. Now, some people just aren’t keeping up with new movies like they once did, or they’re busy in some other way, and I can respect that. But there were a handful of people I was unable to locate, and that’s a shame. However, I’d like to offer my thanks to all of the 2006-2007 Muriels voters who were able to participate in this year’s awards:
Jason Alley
Kent Beeson
Andrew Bemis
Steven Carlson
Dennis Cozzalio
James Frazier
Mark Pfeiffer
Thanks, guys!
Coming tomorrow: the Muriels get snazzy in our second year, and we get some old-media attention – along with a touch of controversy.
Monday, August 17, 2015
2015 Muriels Hall of Fame Postmortem: A Letter From the Management
Hey everybody. Now that we’ve finished with this year’s inductions, I thought I’d chime in with some thoughts of my own, outside of my capacity of Muriels administrator, on the films we’ve honored so far. In the three years we’ve been doing this, we’ve inducted a good mix of movies, ranging from the 1920s to the 1960s and encompassing damn near every major genre world cinema has had to offer. We have thusfar honored films from eleven nations spanning three continents, with countries ranging from Mexico to India to Denmark. Heck, we’ve even included a female director, which considering how limited opportunities were for women filmmakers throughout the world fifty-plus years ago is pretty good for us.
In short, our goal has always been to cast a wide net, and we’ve done a pretty decent job of that so far. Now let’s keep it up.
If you look at the films we’ve inducted to date, we’ve inducted many of the obvious canonical classics (at least, those that have been eligible). I hope that this will compel us to embrace some less obvious choices in the future alongside the as-yet-unrecognized classics. There are a number of important (or at least interest) national cinemas we have yet to recognize. To cite one example, the sixties were a prime time for cinema in Eastern Europe, particularly in Poland and Czechoslovakia. It’s hard to imagine recognizing the greatness of film during this period without honoring important filmmakers like Andrzej Wajda, Milos Forman, and a young tyro named Roman Polanski- to say nothing of seminal works like THE SARAGOSSA MANUSCRIPT and CLOSELY WATCHED TRAINS, all of which will become eligible in the next few years.
Granted, availability can be a factor when it comes to some national cinemas. Good luck trying to get your hands on key titles from Brazil’s Cinema Novo movement or pretty much anything from Africa from the period (though BLACK GIRL, now streaming on Netflix, becomes eligible as of the ’16 Muriels). Still, there’s plenty of good stuff out there if you know where to look. Quite a few golden age Chinese titles can be found on Fandor (though, sadly, not THE GODDESS), and Indian popular cinema is pretty well-represented on DVD if you have a Netflix account. Because while I realize we’ve already inducted an Indian film, their national cinema tradition is so strong that there’s plenty of room for more Indian films in the Hall of Fame.
Additionally, despite the relatively low number of eligible female-directed titles, there are several worthy films from female filmmakers to join Agnes Varda in the Hall of Fame. The most obvious example would be Maya Deren’s MESHES OF THE AFTERNOON, a major example of avant-garde cinema that has appeared on the final Hall of Fame ballot more than once. Another title I included on my initial ballot thisyear is Furough Farrokhzad’s lovely THE HOUSE IS BLACK, which would also allow us to recognize a key work of Iranian cinema, which would become so formidable in later decades. Then there are other female-directed greats like DAISIES, WANDA, A NEW LEAF, and particularly JEANNE DIELMAN, which will all become eligible within the next ten years.
That’s not to say we should discount the established classics altogether. After all, there are plenty of old favorites still to be inducted (Godard, anybody?). But if you’re like me, you probably came of age as a filmgoer at a time when most college courses and critical texts concentrated primarily on the USA, Western Europe, Russia and Japan, and though there are plenty of good films to honor from those regions, perhaps it’s time the Muriels Hall of Fame starts thinking more globally the films it honors. After all, cinema has long been an international medium, and it’s only right that we reflect that reality as well.
In short, our goal has always been to cast a wide net, and we’ve done a pretty decent job of that so far. Now let’s keep it up.
If you look at the films we’ve inducted to date, we’ve inducted many of the obvious canonical classics (at least, those that have been eligible). I hope that this will compel us to embrace some less obvious choices in the future alongside the as-yet-unrecognized classics. There are a number of important (or at least interest) national cinemas we have yet to recognize. To cite one example, the sixties were a prime time for cinema in Eastern Europe, particularly in Poland and Czechoslovakia. It’s hard to imagine recognizing the greatness of film during this period without honoring important filmmakers like Andrzej Wajda, Milos Forman, and a young tyro named Roman Polanski- to say nothing of seminal works like THE SARAGOSSA MANUSCRIPT and CLOSELY WATCHED TRAINS, all of which will become eligible in the next few years.
Granted, availability can be a factor when it comes to some national cinemas. Good luck trying to get your hands on key titles from Brazil’s Cinema Novo movement or pretty much anything from Africa from the period (though BLACK GIRL, now streaming on Netflix, becomes eligible as of the ’16 Muriels). Still, there’s plenty of good stuff out there if you know where to look. Quite a few golden age Chinese titles can be found on Fandor (though, sadly, not THE GODDESS), and Indian popular cinema is pretty well-represented on DVD if you have a Netflix account. Because while I realize we’ve already inducted an Indian film, their national cinema tradition is so strong that there’s plenty of room for more Indian films in the Hall of Fame.
Additionally, despite the relatively low number of eligible female-directed titles, there are several worthy films from female filmmakers to join Agnes Varda in the Hall of Fame. The most obvious example would be Maya Deren’s MESHES OF THE AFTERNOON, a major example of avant-garde cinema that has appeared on the final Hall of Fame ballot more than once. Another title I included on my initial ballot thisyear is Furough Farrokhzad’s lovely THE HOUSE IS BLACK, which would also allow us to recognize a key work of Iranian cinema, which would become so formidable in later decades. Then there are other female-directed greats like DAISIES, WANDA, A NEW LEAF, and particularly JEANNE DIELMAN, which will all become eligible within the next ten years.
That’s not to say we should discount the established classics altogether. After all, there are plenty of old favorites still to be inducted (Godard, anybody?). But if you’re like me, you probably came of age as a filmgoer at a time when most college courses and critical texts concentrated primarily on the USA, Western Europe, Russia and Japan, and though there are plenty of good films to honor from those regions, perhaps it’s time the Muriels Hall of Fame starts thinking more globally the films it honors. After all, cinema has long been an international medium, and it’s only right that we reflect that reality as well.
Muriels Hall of Fame, Class of 2015: Acknowledgements and Final Results List
Thanks to everyone who’s been following the Muriels Hall of Fame this
year. In particular, I would like to thank all who participated in this year’s
voting and contributed write-ups in conjunction with the announcements. This
year’s voters were:
Josh Bell
Andrew Bemis
Christianne Benedict
Scott W. Black
Danny Bowes
Donald G. Carder
Kevin Cecil
Paul Clark
Dennis Cozzalio
Philip Dyess-Nugent
Jim Emerson
James Frazier
Luke Gorham
Jaime Grijalba
Glenn Heath Jr.
Sam Juliano
Peter Labuza
Adam Lemke
Michael Lieberman
Craig D. Lindsey
Matt Lynch
Sam C. Mac
Jeff McMahon
Patrick Miller
Matt Noller
Cole Roulain
Andreas Stoehr
Scott von Doviak
Clayton Walter
Patrick Williamson
George Wu
In addition, here is a tally of the final results of voting:
+ = 2015 Muriels HOF Inductees
9 votes:
+ City Lights (1931, Chaplin)
+ Trouble in Paradise (1932, Lubitsch)
+ Singin’ in the Rain (1952, Kelly/Donen)
+ The Searchers (1956, Ford)
8 votes:
+ Duck soup (1933, McCarey)
+ The Red Shoes (1948, Powell/Pressburger)
+ Touch of Evil (1958, Welles)
7 votes:
+ L’Atalante (1934, Vigo)
+ Bride of Frankenstein (1935, Whale)
+ His Girl Friday (1940, Hawks)
+ Sunset Blvd. (1950, Wilder)
+ Duck Amuck (1953, Jones)
+ Pather Panchali (1955, S. Ray)
+ Rio Bravo (1959, Hawks)
+ Cleo From 5 to 7 (1962, Varda)
+ The Exterminating Angel (1962, Buñuel)
6 votes:
The General (1927, Keaton/Bruckman)
Only Angels Have Wings (1939, Hawks)
All That Heaven Allows (1955, Sirk)
Wild Strawberries (1957, Bergman)
Hiroshima Mon Amour (1959, Resnais)
Breathless (1960, Godard)
Last Year at Marienbad (1962, Resnais)
5 votes:
Bringing Up Baby (1938, Hawks)
The Maltese Falcon (1941, Huston)
Children of Paradise (1945, Carné)
It’s a Wonderful Life (1946, Capra)
A Star Is Born (1954, Cukor)
Sweet Smell of Success (1957, Mackendrick)
Contempt (1963, Godard)
Woman in the Dunes (1964, Teshigahara)
4 votes:
Nosferatu (1922, Murnau)
Seven Chances (1925, Keaton)
I Was Born, But… (1932, Ozu)
Grand Illusion (1937, Renoir)
The Magnificent Ambersons (1942, Welles)
The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948, Huston)
M. Hulot’s Holiday (1953, Tati)
Nights of Cabiria (1957, Fellini)
Paths of Glory (1957, Kubrick)
La Dolce Vita (1960, Fellini)
3 votes:
Freaks (1932, Browning)
Modern Times (1936, Chaplin)
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937, Hand)
Stagecoach (1939, Ford)
The Wizard of Oz (1939, Fleming)
Beauty and the Beast (1939, Cocteau)
Daisy Kenyon (1947, Preminger)
Letter From An Unknown Woman (1948, Ophuls)
Late Spring (1949, Ozu)
Orpheus (1949, Cocteau)
The Diary of a Country Priest (1950, Bresson)
Ordet (1955, Dreyer)
The Killing (1956, Kubrick)
L’Avventura (1960, Antonioni)
2 votes:
The Grapes of Wrath (1940, Ford)
Monsieur Verdoux (1947, Chaplin)
Bicycle Thieves (1948, De Sica)
All About Eve (1950, Mankiewicz)
Rashomon (1950, Kurosawa)
The Steel Helmet (1951, Fuller)
On the Waterfront (1954, Kazan)
The Red Balloon (1955, Lamorisse)
Jules and Jim (1961, Truffaut)
Lolita (1962, Kubrick)
1 vote:
Awaara (1951, Kapoor)
The Court Jester (1955, Panama/Frank)
A Face in the Crowd (1957, Kazan)
See everyone after the New Year for the 2015 Muriel Awards!
Muriels Hall of Fame, Class of 2015: Cleo From 5 to 7 (1962, Agnes Varda)
"The great Agnes Varda's roots as a photojournalist and documentarian allow her to layer this story into a backdrop of quotidian beauty. Cleo's journey through the streets of Paris is a stream of jump cuts and micro-vignettes: faces outside a cafe, street performers, a simple cab ride, with the occasional intrusion of the news from the Algerian front or of some local politics. The outside world penetrating our own insular one, shocking Cleo, and us, into empathy." ~ Matt Lynch
Click here for the full essay.
Sunday, August 16, 2015
Muriels Hall of Fame, Class of 2015: The Exterminating Angel (1962, Luis Bunuel)
"Hilarious, bizarre, and with an air of almost ethereal grace, The Exterminating Angel remains a one-of-kind experience in the history of cinema. A more than worthy addition to this year's Hall of Fame inductees, it embodies an anarchist spirit sorely underrepresented in the pantheon of World Cinema." ~ Adam Lemke
Click here for the full essay.
Saturday, August 15, 2015
Muriels Hall of Fame, Class of 2015: Rio Bravo (1959, Howard Hawks)
"This is what made Hawks unique to cinema. You could label it as realism or classicism or whatever you like, but Hawks understood that rhythm was the most important element of cinema... Plot and character are everything to Hawks, but it’s rarely emphasized in the way other Hollywood films often do." ~ Peter Labuza
Click here for the full essay.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




